Which Modified PTFE Sheet Is Suitable for Low-Friction Applications?

2026-10-19

A bearing application requires a material with a friction coefficient below 0.15 and a wear rate low enough to survive 10 million sliding cycles. The engineer considers pure PTFE. It has the lowest friction coefficient of any solid material, around 0.04 to 0.10. But the wear rate of pure PTFE is unacceptably high, on the order of 10⁻⁷ mm³/Nm, which means the bearing would fail long before 10 million cycles. The engineer must select a Modified PTFE Sheets with a filler that reduces wear without sacrificing the low-friction characteristic. The choice of filler determines whether the application succeeds or fails. This guide explains the trade-offs between different filler systems for low-friction applications.

Glass-Bead-Filled PTFE Sheet


1. Why Is Pure PTFE Unsuitable for Low-Friction Applications Despite Its Low Friction Coefficient?

Pure PTFE has the lowest friction coefficient of any unfilled polymer, but its wear resistance is poor. Under sliding contact, the PTFE chains slide over one another and transfer to the counterface, forming a transfer film. This film provides low friction, but it also means that the PTFE is being consumed. The wear rate is high, and the material can cold-flow under load. The table below shows the tribological properties of pure PTFE compared to filled grades.

Material Friction coefficient Wear rate (mm³/Nm) Limiting PV (MPa·m/s)
Pure PTFE 0.04 – 0.10 ~10⁻⁷ ~2.5 
Glass-filled PTFE (17%) 0.18 – 0.22 ~10⁻⁸  Moderate
Carbon-graphite filled PTFE 0.10 – 0.20 ~10⁻⁹ to 10⁻⁸ High
Carbon fiber reinforced PTFE 0.08 – 0.15 ~10⁻⁹ 3.80 (with Ni@Gr)

In our factory, we supply Modified PTFE Sheets with several filler systems. The selection depends on whether the priority is the lowest possible friction, the lowest possible wear, or a balance of both. Ningbo Taifno PTFE Plastic Products Co., Ltd. has been compounding filled PTFE for over 12 years.


2. Which Filler System Provides the Best Balance for Low-Friction, Low-Wear Applications?

The best balance for most low-friction applications is achieved with a carbon-graphite filler system. Carbon reduces creep, increases hardness, and elevates thermal conductivity. Graphite provides solid lubrication and lowers the coefficient of friction. The combination produces a material with a friction coefficient of 0.10 to 0.20 and a wear rate two to three orders of magnitude lower than pure PTFE. The table below compares the filler systems for low-friction applications.

Filler system Friction coefficient Wear resistance Thermal conductivity Best for
Graphite only Low (0.08 – 0.15) Moderate Moderate Corrosive service, low abrasion to soft shafts 
Carbon-graphite Low (0.10 – 0.20) Excellent High Non-lubricated bearings, general low-friction 
Carbon fiber Low (0.08 – 0.15) Excellent High High PV applications, fuel oil lubrication 
Bronze Moderate (0.15 – 0.25) Good at ambient High High-load bearings, poor at high temp 
Glass fiber Moderate (0.18 – 0.22) Good Low Creep resistance, oxidizing environments 

Tribology engineer's note: For a low-friction application where wear life is also critical, carbon-graphite filled PTFE is the starting point. It provides a friction coefficient in the 0.10 to 0.20 range and a wear rate that is 100 to 1,000 times lower than pure PTFE. If the application involves high PV (pressure × velocity) or fuel oil lubrication, carbon fiber reinforced grades with hybrid fillers can achieve friction coefficients as low as 0.02 to 0.03 and PV values up to 3.80 MPa·m/s [citation:3].


3. How Does the Operating Environment Change the Filler Selection?

The operating environment determines which filler system is suitable. In dry sliding against steel, glass fiber can abrade the counterface and increase wear. Carbon fiber and graphite are gentler on the counterface. In high-purity hydrogen gas, glass fiber causes severe abrasion on cast iron, while carbon fiber provides excellent low friction and low wear. In high-temperature applications above 100°C, bronze-filled PTFE has the poorest wear resistance, while carbon-graphite grades maintain moderate performance. The table below shows the environmental considerations.

Environment Preferred filler Avoid Reason
Dry sliding against steel Carbon-graphite, carbon fiber Glass fiber Glass abrades the counterface
Hydrogen gas Carbon fiber Glass fiber Glass causes severe abrasion in hydrogen 
High temperature (>100°C) Carbon-graphite Bronze Bronze has poorest high-temp wear 
Corrosive chemicals Graphite, carbon Bronze, glass Bronze corrodes; glass reacts with HF/base
High PV / high load Carbon fiber, bronze Graphite only Carbon fiber and bronze provide load support

In our factory, we provide application-specific Modified PTFE Sheets. For hydrogen service, we recommend carbon fiber filled grades. For chemical service, graphite filled grades. For high-temperature bearing applications, carbon-graphite. Taifno can supply test data for each grade to support the selection.


4. What Are the Trade-Offs Between Friction and Wear for Different Filler Loadings?

The filler loading affects both friction and wear. At low loading (below 5% by volume), the effect on properties is insignificant. At optimal loading (15 to 30% by volume), the wear resistance is maximized. At higher loading, the friction coefficient may increase, and the material may become brittle. The table below shows the effect of filler loading for carbon-graphite filled PTFE.

Filler loading (vol%) Friction coefficient Wear rate (relative to pure PTFE) Compressive strength
0 (pure PTFE) 0.04 – 0.10 1.0 (baseline) Low
10 – 15 0.08 – 0.12 0.01 – 0.05 Moderate
20 – 30 0.10 – 0.18 0.001 – 0.01 High
35 – 40 0.15 – 0.25 0.001 – 0.005 Very high (but brittle)

Selection rule of thumb: For low-friction applications, start with a 15 to 20% carbon-graphite filled PTFE sheet. This provides a friction coefficient around 0.10 to 0.15 and a wear rate that is 100 to 1,000 times lower than pure PTFE. If the application requires higher load capacity or higher PV, increase the loading to 25 to 30% or switch to a carbon fiber reinforced grade. If the application requires the absolute lowest friction coefficient and wear is not the primary concern, a graphite-only grade may be considered. Ningbo Taifno PTFE Plastic Products Co., Ltd. provides samples of each grade for evaluation.


Frequently Asked Questions About Modified PTFE Sheets for Low-Friction Applications

Question 1: Can a graphite-filled PTFE sheet be used in a water-lubricated bearing application?
Answer: Yes, graphite-filled Modified PTFE Sheets can be used in water-lubricated applications, but the performance depends on the water quality and the load. Graphite provides good lubrication and is chemically inert in most water conditions. However, if the water contains abrasive particles, the wear rate may increase. In our factory, we recommend a carbon-graphite grade for water-lubricated bearings because the carbon provides better wear resistance than graphite alone. We also recommend filtering the water to remove particles larger than 50 microns. For potable water applications, we can supply a grade that meets FDA requirements.
Question 2: What is the maximum PV value for a carbon-graphite filled PTFE sheet?
Answer: The maximum PV value for a carbon-graphite filled Modified PTFE Sheets depends on the specific grade, the counterface material, and the lubrication condition. For dry sliding against steel, a typical carbon-graphite grade has a limiting PV of 2.5 to 4.0 MPa·m/s. For fuel-oil-lubricated applications, carbon fiber reinforced grades with hybrid fillers have achieved PV values up to 3.80 MPa·m/s. The PV limit is determined by the temperature rise at the sliding interface. If the PV exceeds the limit, the PTFE matrix softens, and the wear rate increases rapidly. In our factory, we provide PV limit data for each grade based on laboratory testing. We also recommend a safety factor of 1.5 to 2.0 when selecting the grade for a specific application.
Question 3: How does the counterface surface finish affect the friction and wear of a modified PTFE sheet?
Answer: The counterface surface finish has a significant effect on both friction and wear. A very rough counterface (Ra > 1.0 µm) will abrade the PTFE and increase the wear rate. A very smooth counterface (Ra < 0.1 µm) may not allow a transfer film to form, which can increase the friction coefficient. The optimal counterface finish for carbon-graphite filled Modified PTFE Sheets is Ra 0.2 to 0.4 µm. This finish allows a thin, uniform transfer film to form while minimizing abrasive wear. In our factory, we recommend that the counterface be ground or machined to this finish before installation. We also recommend that the counterface be hardened to at least 45 HRC for high-load applications to prevent deformation.

Summary for Tribology Engineers and Designers

The selection of a Modified PTFE Sheets for low-friction applications is a balance between friction coefficient and wear resistance. Pure PTFE has the lowest friction but unacceptably high wear. Carbon-graphite filled grades provide the best balance for most applications, with friction coefficients in the 0.10 to 0.20 range and wear rates 100 to 1,000 times lower than pure PTFE. Carbon fiber reinforced grades are suitable for high PV and fuel oil lubrication. Graphite-only grades are suitable for corrosive environments where low abrasion to the counterface is important. The operating environment, filler loading, and counterface finish all affect performance. Ningbo Taifno PTFE Plastic Products Co., Ltd. has been compounding filled PTFE for over 12 years and provides application-specific grades with full test data.

Ningbo Taifno PTFE Plastic Products Co., Ltd. manufactures Modified PTFE Sheets with graphite, carbon-graphite, carbon fiber, bronze, and glass fillers. We provide friction and wear test data, PV limits, and application recommendations for all of our products.

Need help selecting the right modified PTFE sheet for your low-friction application? Contact Ningbo Taifno PTFE Plastic Products Co., Ltd. for a free consultation. We will review your operating conditions and recommend the optimal filler system and loading.
Previous:No News
Next:No News

Leave Your Message

  • Click Refresh verification code